{"id":994,"date":"2021-02-04T21:00:35","date_gmt":"2021-02-04T21:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/s856749478.onlinehome.fr\/?p=994"},"modified":"2021-03-08T21:08:36","modified_gmt":"2021-03-08T21:08:36","slug":"chronologie-du-proces-1998-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/?p=994","title":{"rendered":"Chronologie du proc\u00e8s : 1998 – 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Chronologie – 1998 – 2003<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n

Chronologie des \u00e9v\u00e9nements et des proc\u00e9dures<\/strong><\/p>\n

8 juin 1998<\/strong>
\nLe Comit\u00e9 National d\u2019Entente des Anciens d\u2019Indochine (CNEI) assure l\u2019ANAPI de son soutien financier.<\/p>\n

9 septembre 1998<\/strong>
\nLa Cour d\u2019Appel de Paris d\u00e9boute l\u2019ANAPI et W. SOBANSKI estimant que les faits \u00e0 l\u2019origine de la proc\u00e9dure ne peuvent plus recevoir de qualification p\u00e9nale en raison de la Loi d\u2019Amnistie de 1996.<\/p>\n

D\u00e8s le lendemain, le 10 septembre, le Pr\u00e9sident de l\u2019ANAPI demande \u00e0 Ma\u00eetre VARAUT de se pourvoir en cassation. Une copie de cette d\u00e9cision est transmise \u00e0 W. SOBANSKI.<\/p>\n

9 septembre 1999<\/strong>
\nLa Cour de Cassation rejette le pourvoi de W. SOBANSKI.<\/p>\n

Le bureau national de l\u2019ANAPI, le 5 octobre 1999 d\u00e9cide \u00e0 l\u2019unanimit\u00e9 la poursuite de son soutien moral et financier \u00e0 l\u2019action future qui serait engag\u00e9e, et son Pr\u00e9sident avise le 7 octobre 1999 le CNEI de cette d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n

2000 \u00e0 2004<\/strong>
\nLa Cour de cassation ayant rejet\u00e9 en 1999 le pourvoi d\u00e9pos\u00e9 contre l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, toutes les voies de recours devant la juridiction fran\u00e7aise \u00e9taient \u00e9puis\u00e9es.<\/p>\n

Avec courage, W. SOBANSKI a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 en 2000 une requ\u00eate devant la Cour europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme et l’ANAPI lui a donn\u00e9 son soutien.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Dans sa d\u00e9cision de mars 2003<\/strong>, cette Cour a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 cette requ\u00eate irrecevable pour une question de proc\u00e9dure et de d\u00e9lai, sans jamais se prononcer sur le fond. W. SOBANSKI d\u00e9pose \u00e0 nouveau une requ\u00eate devant la Cour europ\u00e9enne sur le fondement de l’article 13 de la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme.
\nL\u2019ANAPI continue \u00e0 le soutenir, de m\u00eame que la majorit\u00e9 du Conseil national d\u2019entente des anciens d\u2019Indochine.<\/p>\n

Views: 27<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chronologie – 1998 – 2003 Chronologie des \u00e9v\u00e9nements et des proc\u00e9dures 8 juin 1998 Le Comit\u00e9 National d\u2019Entente des Anciens d\u2019Indochine (CNEI) assure l\u2019ANAPI de son soutien financier. 9 septembre 1998 La Cour d\u2019Appel de Paris d\u00e9boute l\u2019ANAPI et W. SOBANSKI estimant que les faits \u00e0 l\u2019origine de la proc\u00e9dure ne peuvent plus recevoir de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"table_tags":[],"class_list":["post-994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-affaire-boudarel"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"ANAPI","author_link":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/?author=1"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Chronologie – 1998 – 2003 Chronologie des \u00e9v\u00e9nements et des proc\u00e9dures 8 juin 1998 Le Comit\u00e9 National d\u2019Entente des Anciens d\u2019Indochine (CNEI) assure l\u2019ANAPI de son soutien financier. 9 septembre 1998 La Cour d\u2019Appel de Paris d\u00e9boute l\u2019ANAPI et W. SOBANSKI estimant que les faits \u00e0 l\u2019origine de la proc\u00e9dure ne peuvent plus recevoir de\u2026","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=994"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":995,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/994\/revisions\/995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=994"},{"taxonomy":"table_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anapi.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftable_tags&post=994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}